至於點樣用PhotoCap,就唔再講了,有興趣去睇返D舊blog就OK....
如果你有興趣直接用我做的月曆卡,隨便下載便可以,想要更高解像度的原圖,留言比我吧。
| 曾經介紹過景深的觀念,拍攝的物體,若在景深範圍之外,就不會清晰了。其實,除了景深之外,還有一些別的因素,影響到我們照片的清晰與否。 不如,由一張我昨晚在屋外拍的飛蛾說起。 | We have talked about how dof is used in obtaining a sharp photo. Actually there are other factors affecting whether a photo is sharp enough or not. Let us start by considering a photo of a moth that I took last night outside my home. |
| 這是一張微距拍攝的照片,大概是1:2的大小,亦即是說在感光材料上的大小,是原飛蛾的一半。在物理學上說,這麼大的放大率,相機要十分接近飛蛾,所以景深十分淺,要用極細的光圈拍攝。據exif顯示,拍攝光圈是f24。 | This is considered as a macro photo. It is 1:2 meaning that the magnification is 50%. From optics we can easily conclude that the picture is taken at a very close distance. From the previous discussion, this gives a shallow dof. The exif information shows that f24 is used to get around this shallow dof so that the whole moth is clear and sharp. |
f24是極細的光圈,以晚上的光線計,用f24光圈,曝光時間就上等上十多秒了。試想想,在這十多秒期間會發生什麼事呢?
就像下面一張長時間曝光的相片一樣,當然,這可能是你預期要有的效果。 | f24 is a really small aperture. To have correct exposure, the shutter speed may over 10 sec. What would happen in this period of time?
The following picture is a typical long exposure time picture. This may, or may not, be the effect you desired. |
| 拍照時,相機必然有震動,怎樣的快門速度才夠快讓我們不用害怕相機移了位呢? 原來經過了長時間的實踐,我們已找出一個所謂安全快門的公式,那就是看一看你所用的鏡頭焦距,若是50mm,你的安全快門就是1/50秒,比這慢的快門如1/30秒等,都有可能因相機的移動導致相片不清晰。 如果改用500mm的長鏡,安全快門就只有1/500秒,所以鏡頭的焦距越長,越易因相機的震動而得不到清晰的照片。 | The vibration of the camera cannot be avoided. So, how fast a shutter speed is fast enough to have a sharp picture? There is a safe speed for every lens of a certain focal length. For a 50mm lens, the safe speed is 1/50 sec. This means that using a shutter speed lower than this, say 1/30 sec, will probably result in a blurred picture. When a tele lens like 500mm lens is used, the safe speed reduced to 1/500 sec. Thus, the longer the focal length, the harder to get a sharp picture due to camera vibration. |
要擺脫安全快門的限制,可以考慮以下各點:
| To go around the safe speed, we may do any of the following steps:
|
| 再看那雙蛾,若你看我的exif,你會發覺我的快門速度並沒有十多秒那樣長,其實,我們還有一個法寶,就是用外部光源照亮物體,那麼,我們就可以返回安全快門。這相片因為用了閃光燈,快門速度只是1/250秒。 有時,我們會以為閃光燈只是一個補光的工具,但實際上它可以做更多的工作,在這裡,我就是用它來加快曝光的完成,除了防手震外,還有兩個作用:
| Back to the moth again. If you peek at my exif information, you will find that the shutter speed is 1/250 sec instead of 10 sec. The reason that I can do this is by an external light source. I use flash to reduce the shutter speed well below the safe speed. Flash itself is not merely a tool for adding light to darker part of a picture. I used it to reduce the time I need to take the picture. Besides that this would help me in reduce the chance of camera motion in giving a blur picture, it also helps in other two ways:
|
| 影相第一件重要的事是拍出來的照片要清晰,不過,有時事與願違,是什麼原因呢? 原來相機有一個對焦的過程,不是遠近的東西都同時可以清晰記錄的,像下面的一張花的照片,當對焦位置在花時,其他的部份就未必/不會清晰了。 | We always hope for a sharp picture but this is not always the result. So, what makes a picture sharp? When taking a picture, there is a process called focusing. This means that not all the things in the picture can be sharp. Only the points near the place we focus is sharp. Like the picture below where the focusing is made on the flower the other parts look blur. |
| 但有些時候我們見到一些照片,是無論遠近都同樣清晰的,好像下面的一張,那又是什麼原因呢? | However, we can also have pictures like the one below with the whole picture in focus. So, what makes the difference? |
| 原來這兩張相片拍攝的參數大不相同﹝可以觀看原相片的EXIF資料,若果你有exif viewer之類可以真接觀看,若沒有,可以到以下網址便能看到原圖的基本拍攝資料 圖1 圖2﹞ | The main difference lies in the way we take these pictures. You can learn this from the exif information of the pictures. Use your exif viewer to learn the parameter of them or you can click fig 1 fig 2 for the details |
| 圖1是所謂淺景深的作品,清晰範圍有限,圖2是長景深的作品,由最近的物件到最遠處都在清晰的範圍內。 下面幾張相片,你該可以說出誰是淺景深,誰是長景深的作品: | Fig 1 is of typical shallow dof picture where only a very small part of the picture is in focus. On the other hand, fig 2 is what we said a picture of long dof. For a picture with long dof, nearly all the things in the picture should be in focus. For the pictures below, you should be able to tell which one is of shallow dof and which one is long dof. |
| 何時用長景深、何時用短景深沒有準則的,視乎你的設計和表達的方式,一般而言,風光照片當然最好盡量的長景深,以便大家把當地的風光看得一清二楚,但也沒有人說不可以用淺景深令大家集中視線在一個位置上。同理,拍攝花卉時我們會想用淺景深把主體以外的東西糊起來不要分散注意力,但這也是一個普遍的準則,沒有非守可的規定。 | It is only a personal choice in when to use shallow dof and when not to. But for a general rule, people like to use long dof in landscape photos as the main purpose of this kind of photos is to show the beauty of the land. For taking a photo of flowers, you may consider using shallow dof as to concentrate on the flowers themselves. |
| 用圖1及圖2的拍攝參數來說明如何控制景深: 圖1鏡頭的焦距是23mm,光圈是f5.6;而圖2的鏡頭是18mm,光圈則是f8。兩圖都是用非常短的焦距來拍攝,圖1是歸入廣角鏡之類,圖2則是超廣角範圍了,一般來說,廣角鏡的景深較長。 光圈是相機透光的孔徑的大小,f5.6叫大光圈,當然不是很大,再大的有f4, f2.8, f1.8之類,你會發現數字越小,光圈越大。f8是細光圈了,但也不是很細,還有f11, f16, f22之類。一般來說,光圈越大,景深越淺。 所以圖1的兩個參數都趨向淺景深,得出來的結果就是遠景較糊了;圖2的兩個參數都趨向長景深,因此可以整個畫面都清晰。 為了讓大家更清楚鏡頭和光圈的效果,我特別用了一支135mm焦距的中長鏡用f2.8及f22各對著門前的籬笆拍了一張,你猜得出那是2.8光圈,那是22光圈嗎? | Let's start from looking at the exif data of fig 1 and fig 2. From the exif information, fig 1 was taken by a lens of focal length 23mm with aperture f5.6 while fig 2 was from 18mm lens at f8. Both lenses very short in focal length. 23mm lens is what we called wide angle lens while 18mm lens falls in the super wide angle lens category. In general, the dof of a wide angle lens is long. Aperture measures the size of the hole in the camera for the light to enter it. f5.6 is a large aperture but not quite large as there are f4, f2.8 and even f1.8 which corresponding to larger hole and thus larger aperture. You may find this is quite interesting, the larger the value used in aperture is, the smaller is the aperture. Thus, f8 is a small aperture but not quite small as there are smaller apertures like f11, f16 and f22. In general, the larger the aperture is, the shallower is the dof. Thus, fig 1 with 23mm lens and f5.6 favors shallow dof which fig 2 with 18mm lens and f8 gives longer dof. To make the effect of focal length and apeture on dof more clear, I use a 135mm lens to take a picture of the fence at the front of my home with two extreme apertures, f2.8 and f22. Below are the result (fig 7 and fig 8). Can you tell which one is using f2.8 and which one is using f22 aperture? |


| 其實,除了焦距及光圈對景深有影響外,對焦的距離也是一個重要參數。下面兩幅相片,也是135mm焦距及f2.8和f22的結果,但我走遠了才拍,結果當然還是有景深的差異,但好像看起來就沒有圖7及圖8的顯著了。 | Besides lens focal length and aperture, there is one more important factor that affects dof. That is the distance the camera from the object (or the focusing distance). The two photos below are both using 135mm lens at the two apertures as before but at a greater distance from the fence. You can still see the difference in dof but the effect on the change of dof is not so obvious when the distance increases. |


綜合來說,要淺景深的話,就要用長焦距鏡頭、大光圈和近距離拍攝。 | So far, we have reached a conclusion that for taking photos of shallow dof, we need to use long focal length lens (tele lens), great aperture and taking the picture at close distance. |
| 要計算景深,可以找一個網上的計算器幫手,例如:depth of field calculator 利用這類計算器,我寫了個簡單的Excel worksheet,劃了兩幅圖給大家比較: | There are many online depth of field calculator that we can use to find dof. The following graphs are from the Excel worksheet I write to show the focusing range for 85mm lens and 135mm lens. |
| 先看85mm鏡頭的效果,這是光圈5.6的。圖中x軸是對焦的距離,藍色曲線與綠色曲線的範圍是景深所在。可以見到在5米距離時,景深只有一米左右;但當離開15米是,景深已經大於10米。 | The above graph is for 85mm lens at f5.6. The x-axis measures the focusing distance while the blue curve is the far focusing distance and green one for near distance. The range between these two curve is the dof. For an object at 5m, dof is about 1m but increases to 10m when object is 15m away. |
| 換上135鏡頭,5米時景深當然不足1米,就算15米時,亦只有5米的景深;所以,鏡頭的焦距,確會嚴重影響景深的長或淺。 | For 135mm lens at a distance 5m, dof is less than 1m. However, even when we move to 15m from the object, dof does not increase much beyond 5m. Compare these two lenses, we can conclude that focal length of a lens would have great effect on dof thus obtained. |